Making an Escape of Water Claim Without Losing It
Escape of water is the most common domestic plumbing claim and the most commonly disputed. Claims are declined for four recurring reasons, and the language a policyholder uses in the first phone call is often one of them. This page sets out what counts as sudden escape, what trace and access pays for, and what to record before anything is dried.
- Directly employed engineers, not subcontractors
- Fixed price agreed before work starts
- No charge for the visit if you decline the quote
- Written workmanship guarantee on completion
Need this fixing?
Enter a postcode and we will tell you before you call.
We attend 16 London boroughs: Islington, Camden, Westminster, Hackney, Kensington and Chelsea, Hammersmith and Fulham, Wandsworth, Lambeth, Southwark, Lewisham, Tower Hamlets, Greenwich, Croydon, Bromley, Barnet, Ealing.
What counts as escape of water?
Water escaping suddenly from a fixed installation — a pipe, tank, cylinder or fixed appliance. Rainwater ingress is a different peril, and water that has seeped over months is generally treated as gradual damage rather than an escape.
Three elements carry the definition and each is tested separately. The water comes from a fixed installation, which brings in supply pipework, heating pipework, a cold water storage cistern, a hot water cylinder and a plumbed-in appliance, and leaves out a bucket, a fish tank and an overflowing bath. The escape is sudden, which separates it from seepage. And it is water rather than weather, which puts rain through a roof or a window into a different section of the policy entirely.
The distinction that costs claims is the second one. A joint that has been weeping into a floor void for eight months has produced gradual damage, and most wordings exclude it whatever the pipe was doing at the moment it was found.
Why are these claims declined?
Four reasons dominate: the damage reads as gradual rather than sudden, the property was unoccupied beyond the policy period, maintenance was inadequate, or the claimant cannot evidence the state of things before drying began.
- The damage reads as gradual. Staining with a tide line, rot in adjacent timber and salts on plaster all indicate months rather than hours, and a claim describing a sudden burst against that evidence is challenged.
- The property was unoccupied beyond the stated period. The wording names a number of consecutive days and conditions attached to exceeding it.
- Maintenance was inadequate. A known fault left unattended, or a system never serviced where the wording requires it, is a condition breach rather than an escape.
- The state before drying cannot be evidenced. A dried room photographs as an undamaged room, and an adjuster attending after the driers has nothing to assess.
Three of the four are decided by what the policyholder did in the first day, which is why the sequence below matters more than the phone manner on the first call.
Does the policy pay to find the leak?
Most buildings policies include trace and access, which pays to locate the source and reinstate what was opened, up to a stated limit separate from the damage itself. Check the schedule for the figure before commissioning a survey.
Trace and access is a separate clause with a separate limit and, on many policies, a separate excess. It answers for two costs: the investigative work of locating a concealed leak, and the opening up and making good needed to reach it. It does not answer for the water damage, and it does not answer for repairing the pipe.
Reading the limit before the survey is commissioned is the practical point. A policyholder who commissions the work first and reads the schedule afterwards discovers the limit at the moment the invoice lands, and an insurer that appoints its own contractors may decline an invoice from anyone else.
What should I do in the first 24 hours?
Stop the water, photograph everything with a visible date, and notify the insurer before drying starts. Keep damaged materials until told otherwise. Prevention of further damage is a policy duty, so act — but record it as you go.
- Close the internal stopcock and drain the affected run from the lowest cold tap.
- Photograph the whole room, the wet area at its full extent, the source, the affected contents in position, and the meter reading.
- Notify the insurer and obtain a claim number, before any drying equipment arrives.
- Ask what the schedule states for trace and access, and who appoints the contractor.
- Keep every removed material — carpet, underlay, skirting, plasterboard — bagged and labelled until the insurer confirms it can go.
Preventing further damage is a duty under most policy conditions, so waiting for permission before stopping the water is itself a breach. Acting and recording are not in conflict: a photograph takes two seconds and the stopcock takes ten.
Will they replace like for like?
Insurers restore the position you were in, not an improved one. A dated bathroom is reinstated to its previous standard. Upgrading during a claim is possible but the difference is normally paid by the policyholder.
The principle is indemnity: putting the policyholder back into the position they occupied immediately before the loss, no better and no worse. Where a discontinued tile or a matching flooring cannot be obtained, the settlement covers a reasonable equivalent rather than a whole-room replacement, unless the wording says otherwise for matching sets.
An upgrade agreed during reinstatement is a separate arrangement with the contractor, and the difference between the indemnity value and the upgraded specification is paid by the policyholder. Agree that difference in writing before the work starts.
What if the property was empty?
Most policies restrict cover beyond a stated unoccupancy period, commonly around thirty days, and may require the water isolated and heating maintained. Landlords between tenancies are caught by this more often than any other clause.
The unoccupancy clause changes the cover rather than removing it, and it usually does so by adding conditions: the water isolated at the stopcock and the system drained, or the heating maintained at a stated minimum, or regular documented inspections. Meeting one condition where the wording requires another is the failure mode.
Landlords and executors are caught most often, because a property between tenancies or in probate passes the stated period without anybody deciding that it has. Telling the insurer the property is unoccupied is a notification duty in most wordings, and it is the step that keeps the cover intact.
Where to read the rules that actually govern your claim, and the instruction that goes with each — read the current version, because wordings are reissued at every renewal:
- Your policy schedule — the limits, the excesses and the endorsements for your policy. Issued by the insurer at inception and at renewal.
- Your policy wording — the definitions of escape of water and trace and access, the conditions, and the exclusions. Issued alongside the schedule.
- The Financial Ombudsman Service, for a complaint about a declined claim once the insurer’s own complaints process is exhausted — financial-ombudsman.org.uk.
- The Financial Conduct Authority Handbook, ICOBS, for the rules insurers handle claims under — handbook.fca.org.uk.
This page describes how escape of water claims are generally structured. It is not legal advice, it is not advice on any particular policy, and your own schedule and wording override everything written here.